Socialist Sarah Palin and her Socialist Pals.

Here's a Pic of Brian Mason with Sarah Palin from January 2008. Mason is an MLA in the Alberta Legislature and a member of the New Democrat Party (NDP) in Canada. Who are the NDP? Well the New Democrats are one of Canada's National Political Parties that run on a platform of socialist and social welfare values. They recently ended up with 36 seats in the National House of Parliament and are one of the official opposition parties in the Canadian Parliamentary governing system.

So why was a Socialist like Brian Mason meeting with Sarah Palin? They certainly don't share ideological principles. Perhaps though they do. Mason was up in Anchorage to learn from Sarah Palin how the Alaska system of issuing a four figure check to every man, woman and child in Alaska works. A Check that is possible from royalty payments made my large Oil companies drilling in Alaska.

The Alaska government likes to spread this wealth to it's citizens through regular payments to citizens and in fact, Palin spread even more wealth since becoming Alaska Governor increasing the payments to over $3200 per year to each Alaskan.

All this spreading the wealth sounds like one of the basic tenants of Socialist ideology. It's curious that Governor Palin and Senator McCain like to endlessly natter on about Joe the Plumber, Tito the Jackson 5 builder and (for all I know Dora the Explorer) while at the same time painting Barack Obama as an evil socialist who wants to spread the wealth around.

Only a few weeks before being named the Vice Presidential Nominee, Palin was defending her Socialist principles:

“we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.”


Does Senator McCain know he has a socialist on his own ticket???

Darcy Burner and the politics of degrees

Much has been made the last week or so about the Degrees of Dem Darcy Reichert and incumbent Repub Dave Reichert. Reichert, with a new war chest of campaign funds has launched an agressive campaign against Burner claiming that she in effect lied about her "degree in Economics" from Harvard. slumping in the latest polls, Reichert is looking for anything to attack Burner on and if it is over the education qualifications of his opponent, so be it.

What's galling about this is not that Reichert is flat out wrong in his assertions but that his own educational background is wrong - what with stating incorrecting in numerous places that he has a BA when in fact he has an AA degree from a small luthern junior college.

The best response I've though is from this letter to the Seattle Times that clarifies that yes Darcy has an Economics specialty within a Harvard Computer Science degree: Point for burner I think:


Not an exaggeration
As recent Harvard graduates, we have a shocking revelation we would like to share with your readers: Democratic congressional candidate Darcy Burner may have received a degree from Harvard in 1996, but she was neither a computer-science major nor an economics minor, and she was certainly not both ["Darcy Burner's claims of a Harvard econ degree an exaggeration," News, Oct. 22].

The terminology our university uses can be tricky. Graduates of Harvard College (which is part of Harvard University, but actually predates it), receive artium baccalaureus (A.B.) degrees, also known as Bachelor of Arts in English, and instead of majors, we have concentrations. We call teaching assistants "teaching fellows." And despite last year's addition of secondary fields, there was and is still nothing called a minor at Harvard.

As her profile on The Seattle Times' Web site correctly states, Burner's education is, "Harvard University, B.A. in computer science with a special field of economics, 1996." And as she explains on her own Web site, at Harvard, Burner "earned a degree in computer science and economics." There is no contradiction here, no exaggeration, and certainly no lying.

At Harvard, we have joint concentrations, which are like double majors. As of this year, we also have primary and secondary fields, which is like a major and a minor. And to make matters even more confusing, when Burner was at Harvard, the computer-science department required students to choose an area of specialization. Burner chose economics. As a result, Burner completed five upper-level economics courses, in addition to significant course work in computer science and mathematics. Burner's course of study was almost certainly more intensive than that of the majority of economics concentrators at Harvard.

Voters in Washington's 8th Congressional District have more important issues to worry about than the terms in use at Harvard. We hope that The Seattle Times recommits itself to investigating issues that really matter as the election draws near.

-- Jean Yang, Cambridge, Mass., and Seth Flaxman, Switzerland

Darcy Burner - the Real Message

Here's a good video in response to Dave Reichert lies about Darcy Burner's academic background. Support Darcy! Turf Reichert!

You can help Darcy here

7-11 Store Poll Shows Big Obama Lead

A poll at 7-11 convenience stores shows Obama at 59.68 percent and McCain at 40.32 percent.

read more | digg story

McCain Loses It: Calls Americans 'My Fellow Prisoners'

Yes when you are running for President nothing works better than referrring to your audience as "my fellow prisoners" What on earth is going on in this man's head?

read more | digg story